Lanky_Pomegranate530 to AntiTrumpAllianceEnglish • 8 months agoTrump urges US Supreme Court to endorse 'absolute immunity' for ex-presidentswww.reuters.commessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down10 cross-posted to: news
arrow-up191arrow-down1external-linkTrump urges US Supreme Court to endorse 'absolute immunity' for ex-presidentswww.reuters.comLanky_Pomegranate530 to AntiTrumpAllianceEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square14fedilink cross-posted to: news
minus-square@NounsAndWordslinkEnglish28•8 months agoYes, yes, but he’ll already be immune to assassination attempts. What part of Absolute Immunity doesn’t make sense? (Besides all of it)
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•8 months agoThe only way to settle a dispute between two presidents is to have an immune-off. They are exposed to an array diseases and the one who survives has the greatest immunity.
Yes, yes, but he’ll already be immune to assassination attempts. What part of Absolute Immunity doesn’t make sense? (Besides all of it)
LOL nice take!
The only way to settle a dispute between two presidents is to have an immune-off. They are exposed to an array diseases and the one who survives has the greatest immunity.