Former national security adviser John Bolton  tweeted on Tuesday that former President Trump wants to be treated like North Korea’s Kim Jong Un  and people should “get ready.”

Donald Trump  wants Americans to treat him like North Koreans treat Kim Jung Un. Get ready……” Bolton posted on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

Bolton, who served as the national security adviser under the Trump administration, posted a viral clip of Trump speaking with Fox News’s Steve Doocy in 2018, where the former president offered praise for the North Korean leader.

“He’s the head of a country, and I mean he’s the strong head. Don’t let anyone think anything different. He speaks and his people sit up at attention,” Trump is heard saying in the clip. “I want my people to do the same.”

  • theprogressivist
    link
    119 months ago

    Good fucking luck trying to get anyone who isn’t a cultist to bend the knee.

    • @EmpathicVagrant
      link
      99 months ago

      That’s what the militarized law enforcement is for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        Private gun ownership is legal in the US, and the reason the people who wrote the constitution put it in there wasn’t for blowing up Tannerite and posting it to Facebook. Mickey has a surprise tool (it's the second amendment)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Unfortunately the private gun owners mostly seem to want to use them in support of a fascist dictatorship, not against.

          In any case, the best time to stop a fascist dictatorship is before it takes hold.

          • theprogressivist
            link
            139 months ago

            Liberals don’t associate gun ownership with their identities.

        • @EmpathicVagrant
          link
          29 months ago

          I’m EmpathicVagrant and this is my favorite comment on the Citadel.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Why it’s in the constitution is pretty clear, and it isn’t what you’re implying. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…” is why. We didn’t have a standing military, nor was it expected we ever would. Militias were the standard way a nation fought wars at the time, with a few notable exceptions.

          I’m all for what you’re saying, but also the second amendment is an out-dated piece of history. I’m generally pro-gun ownership when done properly, but the second amendment doesn’t say what everyone thinks it says. It is based on an assumption that has been shown to be not true.