@TommyCat to SpaceEnglish • edit-21 year agoAll the Contents of the Universe, in One Graphicimagemessage-square8arrow-up169arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up167arrow-down1imageAll the Contents of the Universe, in One Graphic@TommyCat to SpaceEnglish • edit-21 year agomessage-square8file-text
minus-square@itsAsinlinkEnglish2•1 year agounder “Dark Energy” the caption reads, “theoretical form of energy… behaves the opposite of gravity”. then why does it not also list gravity as a basic component of the universe?
minus-square@999666linkEnglish5•1 year agoGravity is not the only basic component of the universe. What they are saying is that dark energy pushes things apart. It behaves in the opposite manner of the gravity we are familiar with.
minus-square@McJonaldslinkEnglish1•1 year agoso if it doesnt behave like matter and just like an opposite force of gravity, why dont we call it a force?
under “Dark Energy” the caption reads, “theoretical form of energy… behaves the opposite of gravity”.
then why does it not also list gravity as a basic component of the universe?
Gravity is not the only basic component of the universe. What they are saying is that dark energy pushes things apart. It behaves in the opposite manner of the gravity we are familiar with.
so if it doesnt behave like matter and just like an opposite force of gravity, why dont we call it a force?