• Sybil
    link
    18 months ago

    large scale

    this is a setup for a no-true-scotsman. i’ll talk to you about anarchist societies, but i won’t let you define them out of existence.

      • Sybil
        link
        18 months ago

        i’m saying until you define “large scale” you gave your self enough wiggle room to push every scotsman into the sea.

          • Sybil
            link
            18 months ago

            and why should that be the metric?

              • Sybil
                link
                08 months ago

                I guess I just don’t understand what you’re getting at…I don’t have a chart of population sizes. I’m just going to say I don’t know, but an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

                let’s say, though, that none ever existed. so what?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  28 months ago

                  If none exist while socialist projects exist, that suggests that the ideology is nonviable at large scales at this point in time. And “just waiting” while capitalism cripples the biosphere and kills millions is an expression of prioritizing your own perfectionism over preventing actual suffering.

                  • Sybil
                    link
                    -18 months ago

                    I think that many small interconnected communities is what we should be aiming for anyway, so any small community to me is evidence that it can work. The fact that all of these communities are surrounded by imperialists or capitalist societies doesn’t preclude more people from forming egalitarian communities and communicating and working with those that are existant. I have no desire to build a system capable of oppressing people, because I don’t want to be responsible for people’s oppression.