• @AA5B
    link
    English
    28 months ago

    Seems like it certainly needs to. I haven’t noticed any such added fees for the services I subscribe to. If true, that’s a good indication someone is seeking a competitive advantage by misleading potential customers, and good reason to act

    • @Ep1cFac3pa1m
      link
      English
      188 months ago

      This isn’t the worst offender I’ve seen, but it’s still bullshit. They should never be able to advertise it at $84.99 when there are $30.99 in required fees

      • @AA5B
        link
        English
        48 months ago

        That would go immediately on my list of “never do business”