• JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    438 months ago

    Well yeah. If I was blocked off from communication with everyone, of course I would be anxious. There’s a difference between the security in having your phone on you, and using it all the time.

    • @MasterHound
      link
      English
      138 months ago

      There has to be a happy medium between not isolating your kids while also protecting them from what is a highly corrupting environment. Maybe this is just hindsight, but I look back at my unfiltered internet access as a kid and am pretty pissed off that my parents didn’t get more involved.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Tbh I had good filtered access as a kid but was rabid for more and private internet access, so kinda went off the deep end when I got a phone. I’m not sure what my parents could have done

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        Same here. When I got my first smartphone in highschool, I quickly became massively addicted. I would guess that at least half my time was spent on reddit and 4chan for many, many years.

        Though I don’t blame my parents… How could they have known?

    • @Sorgan71
      link
      English
      -118 months ago

      Its communication that harms young brains. Kids should never have unrestricted access to the internet.

      • JackGreenEarth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        That sounds like censorship to me (and thus, a bad thing). Maybe it’s just because I come from a background where my ultra religious parents censored the entire secular world from me as a child, but I am firmly against any form of censorship.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Goatse, tubgirl, meatspin, or the BME pain olympics are not exactly hallmarks of quality communication and restricting that type of content is valid for minors. It’s not censorship to try to avoid desensitizing kids too early. Sometimes, people need experience before they can see the horrors.

          • @bassomitron
            link
            English
            28 months ago

            I think they were referring to basic information censorship versus letting 10-year-olds/whatever aged minor have unfettered access to the entirety of the internet.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Here are the lines from the guy I replied to:

              That sounds like censorship to me (and thus, a bad thing)

              And…

              but I am firmly against any form of censorship.

              Allowing any censorship would be a bad thing, according to that poster, so I provided a reason why some censorship may be desired.

              Your argument is not on censorship yes or no, but on how far. That’s a different discussion.

              • @bassomitron
                link
                English
                28 months ago

                True, guess I interpreted it less literally. Who knows for certain besides OP, I suppose.

        • @Sorgan71
          link
          English
          -18 months ago

          kids need to have things restricted from them. If a parent believes something is harmful to their kid, then they need to restrict it from them.

      • Эшли Карамель
        link
        fedilink
        English
        98 months ago

        not really. kids need communication, as well as adults: since humans are such social animals. what harms young people more is stuff that decreases attention span, unrealistic body expectations, etc not “communication”