• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -28 months ago

    Nothing wrong with it, just that without you have no real insight into a fundamental aspect of humanity. So you might end up suggesting that women should lose their rights and be treated as literal children / property.

    • 🦄🦄🦄
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I just don’t think one has anything to do with the other. Sex isn’t anything magical that nets you wisdom or insight into not being a misogynic prick.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      98 months ago

      Just no.

      Wanting women to lose their right => not having sex because you are an asshole

      This is the correct implication. Not having sex doesn’t imply anything about the former:

      It is snowing => it is cold

      It is cold =/=> it is snowing

      (Note: the => arrow is an implication. A => B stands for A implies B, meaning if A is true then B must be true, however B can be true regardless of whether A is true)