Kill me now.

    • @Ok_imagination
      link
      1129 months ago

      Hahaha, I like that having it re-read the question fixed the issue…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        439 months ago

        I tried the same Ai and asked it to provide a list of 20 things, it only gave me 5. I asked for the rest and it also apologized and then provided the rest. It’s weird that it stumbles at first but is able to see it’s error and fix it. I wonder if it’s a thing that it ‘learned’ from the data set. People not correctly answering prompts the first time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          109 months ago

          Something else i also encounter with gpt4 a lot is asking “why did you do x or y” as a general curiosity of learning how it handles the task.

          Almost every time it apologizes and does a fully redo avoiding x or y

        • @Gabu
          link
          09 months ago

          Might be an intentional limitation to avoid issues like the “buffalo” incident with GPT3 (it would start leaking information it shouldn’t after repeating a word too many times).

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          119 months ago

          I personally don’t think a large section of the population meets the requirement for general intelligence so I think it’s a bit rich to expect the AI to do it as well.

    • I Cast Fist
      link
      fedilink
      259 months ago

      I still want to know what the fucking fuck triggered “possible self harm” in your first question.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        It’s weird though because they were able to point out they got to absurdity to its comment and it did agree. No it’s not just algorithmic phrase matching, there is an actual “thought process” going on.

        I’ve never been able to get an AI to explain its logic though which is a shame. I’m sure it would be useful to know why they come up with the answers they do.

        • @force
          link
          8
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve never been able to get an AI to explain its logic though which is a shame. I’m sure it would be useful to know why they come up with the answers they do.

          you and AI researchers both. it’s probably a trillion-dollar problem at this point

        • @machinin
          link
          19 months ago

          they were able to point out they got to absurdity to its comment and it did agree. No it’s not just algorithmic phrase matching, there is an actual “thought process” going on.

          Or it just knows to say those words when someone says “are you sure?” or something similar.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            But then it provided the correct answer so it’s not just a rote response. If it was it would say no I am not sure, but then it wouldn’t be able to provide the response.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              My guess is, when they get negative feedback they throw a bit more computing power into your instance for the second reply.

            • @machinin
              link
              19 months ago

              You could test it on a correct answer. Ask a question, see if it gives a correct answer, then ask “are you sure?” to see what kind of response it gives. My guess is that you won’t get an answer like “yes, I’m sure, that was the correct answer.”

      • @Beldarofremulak
        link
        59 months ago

        Just early days of AI fun. Neo probably disconnected from his goo bath or sum idk.

    • @nucleative
      link
      English
      19 months ago

      Normally it ends the conversation at this point and refuses to answer any thing else, disabling the text box. At least it let you try again!