FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

    • zea
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      I’m doing the moral calculations. Fuck Biden, but fuck Trump more. If I vote for Biden, millions suffer. If I vote for Trump (or waste my vote so he wins), even more suffer. Doesn’t take too much evaluating to pick being slapped in the face vs bring punched in the face.

      I absolutely support the undecided campaign in the primaries to put pressure on Biden, but putting pressure on him and the DNC by letting Trump be in charge for another 4 years is a terrible idea. Even without Trump in office the GOP is quickly eroding even the semblance of democracy we’ve had for a while, but with 4 years of Trump accelerating that I think this would be the last time my vote even slightly matters. Then I’d also need to evacuate from the country because I’m trans and don’t want them ruining my life. I’m voting for Biden in the general to avoid that, and then afterwards I guess I have to figure out what I can even do about the still-evolving bad situation that I helped successfully slow.

      If reducing suffering and not letting an impossible perfect be the enemy of the better is amoral, I don’t understand your definition of moral. I’m a utilitarian if you couldn’t tell.

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        > I’m a utilitarian if you couldn’t tell.

        oh my. how do you deal with the fact that the future is unknowable, so the morality of all actions is also unknowable?

        • zea
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          I account for that, obviously. Expected value is a good approximation.

          • HACKthePRISONS
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            to be clear, you acknowledge that you can’t know which actions are moral under your system, but you still rely on it to make moral actions?

            • zea
              link
              fedilink
              28 months ago

              There’s always uncertainty, yes. I suppose other moral systems claim they’re infallible but those people are just kidding themselves.

              • HACKthePRISONS
                link
                fedilink
                58 months ago

                a deontological system places the morality in the action itself, so you know before you do it whether its the right thing to do. ontological systems change the morality of the action depending on the results in the future.

                what if we need trump to be elected in order to escape earth before the sun goes nova? it’s an unknowable proposition, but are you willing to risk all of humanity on voting for biden?

                • zea
                  link
                  fedilink
                  28 months ago

                  If you can convince me voting for Trump will give greater expected value then I’ll do it, but such absurd possibilities like you said usually come with an exact inverse that cancels out its expected value.

                  Should I let that butterfly flap its wings? What if it causes a tornado somewhere?! Or, what if it not flapping causes a tornado somewhere?! Both are equally plausible, so there’s no point in choosing my actions based on them.

                  • HACKthePRISONS
                    link
                    fedilink
                    38 months ago

                    I think you understand the problem of the unknowableness of the effects of our actions, and subsequently how absurd it is to use that as a basis of our morality.

                    I’m not trying to get you to vote for trump, I’m trying to get you to choose a useful moral framework.

    • @Wayren
      link
      English
      38 months ago

      Says the person voting for Trump.

        • @Syrc
          link
          48 months ago

          They said they aren’t voting for Biden, and in a FPTP system that’s what it means.

            • @Syrc
              link
              08 months ago

              And because of how FPTP works, they unfortunately translate to “Trump”, “Biden”, “Whatever” and “I don’t care”.

              • HACKthePRISONS
                link
                fedilink
                38 months ago

                this is straight up election misinformation. a vote for any candidate may only be voted for that candidate, and it can’t be discarded.

                • @Syrc
                  link
                  18 months ago

                  So you think Kennedy or the other candidates are likely to get more votes than Trump and Biden?

              • @whoreticulture
                link
                18 months ago

                You’re not getting it, it doesn’t matter who wins the next election because Trump and Biden are so very similar. So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration. If the Democrats saw that they lost the election bc 10-20% of voters issued a protest or third party vote, which actually happened during the primaries, it would make a huge impact.

                • @Syrc
                  link
                  18 months ago

                  So many of the things people are saying Trump will do is already happening under the Biden administration.

                  …because of officials elected by Trump.

                  There’s a crapload of policies others already pointed out that make Biden extremely different from Trump, if you still think they’re “very similar” you’re just being willfully ignorant at this point.

                  • @whoreticulture
                    link
                    18 months ago

                    Biden is definitely more palatable, but at the end of the day, either way we will have a president happy to fund genocide. Either way we waste billions on military, have a huge incarcerated prison population, deport immigrants, could go on. Biden was vice president during Obama’s drone strikes.