• @chiliedogg
    link
    83 months ago

    If you lose control driving and knock over an old tree and out lands on my house, you’re not only responsible for the tree - you owe me a house.

    The economic damage of destroying a bridge that’ll take years to replace plus blocking a major port until debris can be cleared is going to be at least 10-figures - probably more.

    • @TechNerdWizard42
      link
      -33 months ago

      Nobody is disputing that.

      The value of the tree ironically does go up a lot over time. But it’s still the value of the tree. The value of everything else is still a cost and that is EXACTLY THE POINT I MADE. The cost of the tree is insignificant compared to the house and you’re hotel bills.

      Reading comprehension… It’s a glorious thing, and lost on Americans.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        43 months ago

        My fellow lemming. You made a terse comment that was prone to misinterpretation. People misinterpreted it.

        I see what you’re trying to say, and I see how people are understanding it differently than you may have intended.

        I’m not saying your underlying message was wrong, certainly a rusted old bridge is momentarily not worth the same money that it was when it was installed, but that’s not how you seem to have been interpreted.

        I won’t tell you what to do, but if I may make a suggestion: it may be prudent to be a little less terse.

        Have a good day.

      • @chiliedogg
        link
        23 months ago

        The point you made?

        Someone said replacing the bridge would cost billions and you called them out saying that it’s rusty and decaying.

        And the value of trees is a complicated subject. A significant part of my life is dealing with trees and the laws surrounding them for a municipal government.