Luis Rubiales could face a prison sentence of two and a half years if convicted of kissing Jenni Hermoso on the lips against her will, court documents have shown. The former Spanish football federation chief has been charged with one count of sexual assault and one of coercion in the aftermath of the kiss, offences carrying jail terms of one year and 18 months respectively.

The 46-year-old grabbed ­Hermoso and kissed her on the lips on 20 August during the awards ceremony after Spain beat England in the Women’s World Cup final in Sydney, sparking global outrage and ­causing a national debate in Spain about ­sexism. ­Hermoso and her teammates said the kiss was unwanted and demeaning, but Rubiales argued it was consensual and denied any wrongdoing.

    • @Kbobabob
      link
      English
      278 months ago

      So they want to get him off the street as the violent sexual predator criminal he is?

      FTFY. The answer is yes BTW.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -248 months ago

        For a kiss? Ok, sure.

        Thought you people hated the policestate but whatever… a fine, sure, but prison! This clown world man…

        • Bonehead
          link
          fedilink
          308 months ago

          For the unwanted sexual assault, and the concerted effort to dismiss and reframe the event afterwards that was designed to silence her while never taking responsibility for anything.

          Like seriously, the charges are in the article. And here you are, trying to dismiss and reframe the event afterwards…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -168 months ago

            The 46-year-old grabbed ­Hermoso and kissed her on the lips on 20 August during the awards ceremony

            If that’s sexual assault, that also should be punished with jail, remains for the court to decide. Not for you, though, since you have no authority at all.

            And I think this whole thing is fucking ridiculous

            • Bonehead
              link
              fedilink
              188 months ago

              If that’s sexual assault, that also should be punished with jail, remains for the court to decide.

              It was sexual assault, and the punishment was jail as decided by a judge. But here you are, arguing against it despite having no authority at all…

                • Bonehead
                  link
                  fedilink
                  8
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  The conviction still has to be decided, yet the action has been judged to be sexual assault which is what brought the charges in the first place, and the judge had already decided the jail time involved. Try to keep up.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Did you even bother reading further or does your brain only have capacity for that single sentence?

              Edit: I’m feeling generous so I’ll help you:

              The former Spanish football federation chief has been charged with one count of sexual assault and one of coercion in the aftermath of the kiss, offences carrying jail terms of one year and 18 months respectively.

              Hermoso and her teammates said the kiss was unwanted and demeaning, but Rubiales argued it was consensual and denied any wrongdoing.

              I’ll break this down for you. Two scenarios.

              Scenario#1 (where it could have gone):

              • Rubiales kisses Hermoso (does not look consensual)
              • Rubiales profusely apologizes in the aftermath and shows genuine remorse for his actions without spewing shit
              • He gets a fine and a slap on the wrist

              Scenario#2 (where it went):

              • Rubiales kisses Hermoso (does not look consensual)
              • Hermoso says it was unwanted
              • Rubiales contradicts
              • Rubiales doubles down, gaslights
              • His team wants him to step down
              • Rubiales throws a tantrum

              Admitting when you are wrong or did something wrong is manly. Rubiales is a powerhungry psychopath.

            • @Kbobabob
              link
              English
              88 months ago

              So you would be cool if some dude grabbed you and kissed you in the lips against your will?

              • @dogslayeggs
                link
                English
                38 months ago

                I’ve spent a lot of time in West Hollywood with my gay friends. I’ve had that exact thing happen. Was I cool with it? Not exactly, but I also understand it’s different for women vs men because of both the power difference and the consistency. Do I think it warranted 30 months in jail? Jesus fuck, no. Do I think it deserved 1 month in jail? Again, no. A night in jail to think about what you’ve done plus a public apology so other men start seeing that it’s not OK? That’s starting to sound right.

                Again, I understand it is different when this happens to women vs men, but I’ve had women in clothing stores walk by and grab my ass. That’s much worse than this case, but I don’t think that deserves a month in jail, let alone 30.

                Now, the part where he tried to coerce her into saying it was welcomed and she was fine with it, that’s where the real punishment should come from.

                • livus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  48 months ago

                  @dogslayeggs

                  Now, the part where he tried to coerce her into saying it was welcomed and she was fine with it, that’s where the real punishment should come from.

                  According to the article the potential maximum punishment for coercion is one and a half times the potential maximum punishment for sexual assault.

                  They arrived at the 30 month figure by adding the two together. Given that ratio and the circumstances, I think it’s likely that the bulk of whatever sentence he does receive will be drawn from the coercion charge.

                • @Kbobabob
                  link
                  English
                  6
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  So what do you mean by?

                  I think this whole thing is fucking ridiculous

                  It seems you are uninterested in any kind of justice for the victim.

        • athos77
          link
          fedilink
          108 months ago

          No, not for “a kiss”, for sexual assault and coercion just like it says in the article.

        • @Mango
          link
          English
          -28 months ago

          I hate the police state. Those people over there hate whatever made them mad in middle school.

        • roastedDeflator
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Of course not. This is why Murvel’s question seemed so weird that I thought of asking.

          • NoIWontPickAName
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            Oh, I thought we were doing a bit.

            Like I agree with you, just thought we were going for dark humor

            • roastedDeflator
              link
              fedilink
              38 months ago

              It looks like we had different visibility of the fediverse, I am in kbin. It seemed like you asked me. Murvel’s comment just arrived. It still looks like you ask me.