• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2311 months ago

    There’s some inherent risk in the ad blocker as well, though. If it’s an extension, you’re trusting that this thing you installed, that can read and modify every website you visit, isn’t going to do anything sneaky. Yes, maybe it’s open source, but every once in a while something sneaks into open source projects, too. It will get caught, but it could be after the damage is done.

    I mean, I use an ad blocker. But I don’t think it’s unreasonable to value security and not use one.

      • @Rose
        link
        111 months ago

        Do they reduce it like xz?

    • @kadu
      link
      911 months ago

      But by that logic, absolutely everything other than standing still in a fethal position in a dark cave is a cyber security risk.

      Are you using an extremely solid version of Linux? Wellllll, sometimes bad actors can push bad code to open source projects! It’s a risk!

        • @kadu
          link
          411 months ago

          Yes, which is why that can’t be used as an argument against one specific tool.

          • @QuaternionsRock
            link
            411 months ago

            The benefits massively outweigh the risks when it comes to open source ad blockers (lets be honest, we’re all talking about uBO), but limiting your attack surface is a very widely practiced concept in cubersecurity, and there’s no situation where it is totally without merit.

            • @kadu
              link
              011 months ago

              Not using a browser extension but loading JavaScript isn’t limiting your attack surface

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                To be fair, I bet some percentage of those that don’t use an ad blocker ARE using something like no script and just don’t need one as a result.