A Telegram user who advertises their services on Twitter will create an AI-generated pornographic image of anyone in the world for as little as $10 if users send them pictures of that person. Like many other Telegram communities and users producing nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images, this user creates fake nude images of celebrities, including images of minors in swimsuits, but is particularly notable because it plainly and openly shows one of the most severe harms of generative AI tools: easily creating nonconsensual pornography of ordinary people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -2
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I say stop antagonizing the AI.
    The only difference between a skilled artist making it with Photoshop and someone using a Neural Net, is the amount of time and effort put into creating the instance.

    If there are to be any laws against these, they need to apply to any and every fake that’s convincing enough, no matter the technology used.


    Don’t blame the gunpowder for the dead person.
    People were being killed by thrown stones before that.

    • @Ultragigagigantic
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The laws that oppress us on a daily basis suck ass I’ll give yall that for fucking sure… but downvoting someone wishing for the law equally being applied to all?

      Maybe I should go back to 4chan.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        OooOo!
        That’s some high number of dwnv0t3s!
        I wouldn’t have realised unless you had replied here.

        Nice, but it’s also good that everyone is at least free to downvote and see the number of downvotes, unlike YouTube.


        All over history, there has been this trend of people misusing technology and then blaming the technology instead of those that misuse it. This trend is detrimental to the technological progress of a civilisation and is one of the driving forces, causing the cycle that our civilisation is stuck in (of losing all tech and history every once a while and then having to start over from the dark ages).
        Technology, gives someone the ability to do something, but it is their will that makes them want to do so. If the “something” is considered “bad” for society, then instead of taking away the ability, we need to insist on getting the person to understand, why and how, said “something” is a problem for the society.

        Until this problem is fixed, we are going to be stuck at the barrier and the next levels of civilisation shall stay a part of Fiction.