minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•10 months agoFedora and debian was affected in beta/dev branch only, unlike arch
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•10 months agoUnlike arch that has no “stable”. Yap, sure; idk what it was supposed to mean, tho.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•10 months agoYes, but Arch, though it had the compromised package, it appears the package didn’t actually compromise Arch because of how both Arch and the attack were set up.
Fedora and debian was affected in beta/dev branch only, unlike arch
Unlike arch that has no “stable”. Yap, sure; idk what it was supposed to mean, tho.
Yes, but Arch, though it had the compromised package, it appears the package didn’t actually compromise Arch because of how both Arch and the attack were set up.