Bonus points for any books you believe are classics from that time period. Any language, but only fiction please.

I’m really excited to see what Lemmy has.

  • Digital Mark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    116 months ago
    • Greg Egan
    • Rudy Rucker
    • Vernor Vinge

    Hard, computational SF aren’t given nearly the respect they should, and these apply math, comp sci, and physics in a way nobody else does. If there’s any civilization in the future, they’ll be seen as visionary.

    Runners-up are Robert L. Forward, Alastair Reynolds, but Forward has very little computation, and Reynolds doesn’t show his math too often.

    • The Bard in Green
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Reading Egan is like getting a PHD in mathematics and a PHD in quantum physics, then going to Burning Man and doing 18 hits of acid.

      Strongly agree about Reynolds and VInge.

    • Digital Mark
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      Some of Rudy’s books are free, and they will blow your minds. Software, etc. and Postsingular as “what technology can do to us”, and White Light as “how does infinity work in a story context”; he also has a couple non-fiction books on infinity.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Haven’t read Egan or Rucker, so I can’t speak to them. Vinge had amazing ideas that still pop into my head from time to time, but I couldn’t get into his writing style; he never really pulled me in, despite how much I wanted to bet pulled in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        I couldn’t finish a Deepness in the Sky. It didn’t seem like the sci-fi was important - it was just a setting.

    • cheee
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      The problem I had with Vinge’s Sky series is that the first book is so, so amazing. Like wonderfully amazing concepts that I wanted to read all about, so I immediately went and read the other 2.

      Book 2 is ok but crap compared to book 1.

      And book 3 sucks.

      Neither book 2 or 3 explore any of the interesting concepts from A Fire Upon The Deep, and I wanted so, so much more, and it just left me deeply disappointed.

    • @ClockworkOtter
      link
      16 months ago

      Reynolds sometimes lacks a touch on the human side of his work. That being said, I’ve not read much of his more recent novels so he might have matured since finishing his 10 year contract.