This week, Jon Stewart devoted his edition of The Daily Show to tackling a topic that he claims his former bosses at Apple barred him from exploring. “I wanted to have you on a podcast and Apple asked us not to do it,” the late-night host said to his guest Monday night, Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, referencing the companion podcast to his former series, The Problem with Jon Stewart that ended last October. “They literally said, ‘Please don’t talk to her.’”

Stewart’s remarks arrive less than two weeks after the U.S. Justice Department sued Apple for exploiting its monopoly in the tech market and violating antitrust laws. The lawsuit highlights Apple’s “power over content creators and newspapers” and notes that the company’s conduct “even affects the flow of speech,” adding, “Apple is rapidly expanding its role as a TV and movie producer and has exercised that role to control content.”

After joking that Apple killed Khan’s potential appearance on the podcast because “I didn’t think they cared for you,” Stewart alleged that Apple also told him not to discuss artificial intelligence. “They wouldn’t let us do even that dumb thing we just did in the first act on AI,” he said, referring to a segment earlier in that episode on the “false promise” of that technology. Stewart then asked Khan: “What is that sensitivity? Why are they so afraid to even have these conversations out in the public sphere?”

Khan replied, “I think it just shows the danger of what happens when you concentrate so much power and so much decision making in a small number of companies.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -119 months ago

    Apple is a monopoly that “affects the flow of speech” yet I know nothing of any of this and am completely unaffected.

    I don’t get it. Just buy different phones.

    • @SquirtleHermit
      link
      159 months ago

      Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but if a monopoly was powerful enough to “affect the flow of speech”, wouldn’t they try to use that power to ensure you know nothing of it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        My ipad is a glorified notebook. I don’t get any news from Apple, Google or the usual suspects because I assume it is all curated distraction bait. I learn all I need to know about how things are going by looking out my car window when driving through town. (It’s not going well)

        • @SquirtleHermit
          link
          59 months ago

          That’s super cool and all, I’m sure that is a sufficient sample size to be well informed, but now I’m confused as to your main point.

          Do you mean to imply you don’t understand the issue with Apple controlling a massive amount of information because your lifestyle is representative of the majority of people?

          Or do you mean that news has no potential value and as such is not worth protecting from bad actors?

          Or do you mean that because some people are less aware of and/or dont care about being fed misinformation, they are not worth protecting regardless of any damage that might have on society as a whole?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            My main point is that you are expecting the impossible if you think a company with more cash on hand than the federal government is ever going to do anything but manipulate you. If anything this drama is either for show or an effort by the government to make Apple do even more of their bidding. You will never get fair and balanced reporting or non-manipulative “entertainment” from these fortune 500s. It’s a lost cause. Find independent sources and look to them with skepticism because short of seeing it with your own eyes that’s as close to the truth as you will get.

    • @ocassionallyaduck
      link
      99 months ago

      Cool.

      How do you like the fact that Apple news on iOS affects headlines for literally everyone due to visibility on iOS, and thus will still affect you.

      Or that their ownership of AppleTV and now Apple+ puts them in direct position to edit that speech, even if you see it elsewhere and don’t know Apple did it.

      That’s the point. They’re huge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -89 months ago

        Just don’t use iphones or apple products. It’s a solvable problem. I recommend books. Any history book about a great civilization can explain what is happening now better than the news or movies anyway.

        • @ocassionallyaduck
          link
          39 months ago

          Okay you’re either missing the point that those platforms extend beyond Apple products, or willfully ignoring that.

          Apple has spread its network wide, same as Amazon and Disney.

          “jusy don’t buy from them” seriously misunderstands how wide their reach is.

            • @ocassionallyaduck
              link
              19 months ago

              Not ignoring the issue and advocating to regulation and breakup of companies that carry this level of power.

              Because not buying apple does literally less than nothing to stop them when they are out there potentially purchasing entire movie studios and chipfabricators.

              What, you’re never going to watch movies that Apple (later) owns, and avoid using any tech product that an Apple Silicon fab created?

              No you aren’t, because how would you know unless you’re obsessively tracking all the subbrands and shell companies.