• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I would have said yes to “is violence necessary” because in some situations it is, but I would have not even been able to answer the question as asked, or I would have said no, because I don’t agree with what they are saying violence is necessary for. The context is important, and flavored how people answered the question.

    My comment was for people who understand that polling can be biased based on how you word the question.

    “Do you think violence is necessary” is how the poll is being reported on, but that is not what was asked.

    • @stanleytweedle
      link
      English
      09 months ago

      You think this phrasing was biased against republicans. I offered an equivalent phrasing that would be similarly biased against dems.

      Do you think more dems would have responded positively to political violence if it was just phrased a little differently?

          • @Cosmicomical
            link
            49 months ago

            Lol, why even make a poll? next time we have a question we can ask you

            • @stanleytweedle
              link
              English
              09 months ago

              They did make a poll and it turns out Republicans are more into political violence- whoda thunkit?

              But by all means tell me how the responses were biased by the phrase ‘back on track’ ;)

              • @Cosmicomical
                link
                09 months ago

                Hm ackschually, republicans are not necessarily into political violence per sé, they are really into bootlicking the rich at all costs

                • @stanleytweedle
                  link
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  January 6th kinda proved they love doing one in service of the other.

            • @stanleytweedle
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              What’s another phrasing that you think would be equivalently biased against dems?