• Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    233 months ago

    Dude, I learned how to write HTML in the 90’s and even back then everyone knew that apache2 was clearly fucking superior. IIS has been a joke since the 90’s when it was released.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        I remember trying to get it to work with MySQL, failing, and moving to apache.

      • @Aceticon
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I had to do it for work at some point in the late 90s and IIS did actually had a pretty good configuration application whilst Apache was all text configuration files.

        The problem was that IIS compared to Apache was heavier, less performant and scalable, not as stable and it required Windows (if I remember it correctly it was even heavilly tied to other MS software such as their database).

        Apache did require a bit more expert knowledge to get going, but in all else it was already superior to IIS.

        I’m surprised anybody still uses IIS.

    • @Aux
      link
      English
      53 months ago

      Except that’s not what was happening. IIS came after Apache and played a catch up for a while. It almost surpassed Apache in 2007, but GFC happened and its popularity dropped rapidly. If not for GFC, there would be no Apache today.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        33 months ago

        Nginx also increased in popularity around that time, giving more competition to IIS. Most of the web stacks I’ve seen recently are running Nginx.

        (I’m an HAProxy man myself.)

        • @Aux
          link
          English
          13 months ago

          NGINX is rarely used as a web server, it’s usually used as a reverse proxy, cache and SSL terminator. Just like HAProxy, Varnish, etc.

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            How are we defining a web server? Because to me it’s “the thing listening on Port 80 or 443 that responds to HTTP requests.”

            And, yes, I know they do more than that, but they also do those things quite a bit.

            • @Aux
              link
              English
              -33 months ago

              There’s a pretty clear distinction between a web server and a reverse proxy if you work in the field.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
                link
                fedilink
                53 months ago

                I’ve got over 20 years of experience in the field. I’ve configured both of them as reverse proxies and web servers.

                If Nginx is accepting connections on ports 80 and 443, terminating SSL, and responding to HTTP requests, that makes it a web server. Especially if it’s responding with static content.

                • @Aux
                  link
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  Oh my…