• @RedditWanderer
    link
    -47 months ago

    Bro way to come in late to the conversation like anybody was talking to you.

    I responded to a comment that was talking about the technology itself, not the article. What I said still stands, go be pedantic somewhere else.

    • admiralteal
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You didn’t reply to a comment. Your post is top-level.

      You’re confused and defensive and don’t know what is going on here.

      And the “technology itself” is CCS, not DAC. It’s not the technology you think it is. Try to learn instead of being a jerk.

      • @RedditWanderer
        link
        -27 months ago

        The comment you replied to is in a thread.

        My original commment does not mention the DAC.

        • admiralteal
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What are you talking about, dude? This thread is about US Steel wanting to use CCS. Your post is top-level, you’ve been talking to me the whole time, and the only other thread here is the guy talking about Swiss steel projects that don’t use CCS nor DAC.

          Your original comment doesn’t mention DAC. It mentions carbon capture. I replied to you basically agreeing and saying I really didn’t think carbon capture has any actual application, at which point your reply showed you didn’t know that DAC and CCS/carbon capture are different things and has been using carbon capture to talk about DAC, so I explained the difference for you – because I know the terms confuse a lot of people. And you got defensive.

          Seriously, I encourage you to take a moment and look through this exchange from the beginning. Clearly it’s not worth continuing, but this is incredibly frustrating for me.