• @jeffw
    link
    5610 months ago

    I’m not seeing this covered in any major outlets. Anyone got a reliable source?

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      7510 months ago

      MSN has it:

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rejected-and-returned-for-correction-docs-for-trumps-175m-bond-get-bounced/ar-BB1l1Nf9

      The bond appears to be fine, it’s the attached paperwork that was rejected.

      "The cause for the rejection, according to the New York County Supreme Court website, is because the requisite paperwork lacked a current financial statement.

      . . .

      “It is also missing the name of his attorney-in-fact. Trump will have a chance to resubmit his request.”

      • @jeffw
        link
        54
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        So… not “filled with filing errors”… It was returned for correction because it missed an attachment, probably on purpose to conceal Trump’s property values. The original posts sounds like the actual bond issue failed somehow, but it was just the court asking for more details.

        • @RapidcreekOP
          link
          1610 months ago

          The bond is rejected and needs to be refilled.

          • @jeffw
            link
            1910 months ago

            The bond was successfully issued. The court filling was returned so that they could add one attachment.

            • @RapidcreekOP
              link
              1710 months ago

              When you say the bond was successfully issued, it doesn’t mean much if it’s not accepted. If you read thr court’s note there is a list of items he must provide.

              • @SkyezOpen
                link
                310 months ago

                To eliminate the semantics: Bond good filing bad.