• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    57
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s their excuse.

    Better be an opt-in feature instead of an opt-out, because I’m tired of needing to turn off new ‘features’ I don’t need that are said to be for something that sounds kind of reasonable but ends up being because they want to track more things and have more control over you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 months ago

      Ya I don’t like the idea either. But what really grinds my gears is that misleading headline that makes it sounds like they are doing it suddenly with no apparent reasons.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        I prefer neutral headlines that don’t promote what is likely to be a lie without the context of the article.

        They say it is for finding lost phones, but I don’t really believe that is the actual reason. They are probably doing some kind of tracking that uses bluetooth and too many people are turning it off for their preferences.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          73 months ago

          Let the reader be the judge. You can be neutral without hiding information. How about “Android 15 can turn Bluetooth on automatically and Google says it’s for finding lost devices”?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            and Google says

            That would be acceptable, but headlines are rarely written that way because of the added length.

    • @LesserAbe
      link
      English
      83 months ago

      If you read the article, it does have a toggle to enable or disable the feature

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If the default setting is on, then it is opt-out.

        It wouldn’t be either without the toggle.