• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 months ago

    I don’t have the energy to read through yet another battery article, so can I be lazy and ask: Does this actually matter or is this a fluff piece about a potential tech that is years away from market?

    • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
      link
      English
      157 months ago

      I read it. It seems real and close to market. They have strategic investment from car companies and the battery charges quickly (5 minutes per 100 miles) while still retaining over 80% capacity after 2000 charges, which is apparently a typical regulation for EVs. Their goal is to get it down to 3 minutes per 100 miles of range so fast charging a car will be about like pumping gas and not a thing where you bring a Kindle or a Switch/SteamDeck to juice up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        That is impressive, and sounds like it’s much more feasible than some of the stuff we’ve seen over the years.

    • Jesus
      link
      English
      37 months ago

      Today’s research won’t impact you tomorrow, but research from a 5 to 10 years ago will impact you tomorrow. We’ve got to look at the bigger picture.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        While true, most of the time these articles come out, it’s talking about a theoretical improvement in a battery that isn’t likely feasible without a massive change in available materials, or their costs.

        • Jesus
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          And these early learnings compel others to do more research in the space, invest in the space, and eventually bring some stuff to market.

          All of the tech that we use right now can be mapped back to research that uncovered knowledge with no immediate practical applications at the time.

    • @solrize
      link
      English
      07 months ago

      Yes, fluff piece etc.