• @chiliedogg
    link
    811 months ago

    Couple reasons.

    One: do you know anything about that model of firearm? Does it have a safety? Can it slam-fire if handled improperly?

    Two: Is there important information that can be conveyed by the present condition of the firearm. Was it a shooting or an accident. Would clearing the firearm remove important information that can be used to ascertain what happened?

    Three: Preserving the firearm can preserve evidence. While that is not necessarily part of the duty of medical staff, there’s no reason to risk destroying evidence if the firearm can be safely isolated with minimal disturbance.

    Four: Why do it? An isolated, secure gun isn’t going to decide to start blasting people on its own. What advantage is there to handling the gun more than is necessary in that situation? Get it out of the way and keep working.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re already assumed to be handling the gun from the onset. Most handguns are pretty standard if they’re from this century. The physician is likely wearing gloves and the conviction isn’t as important as everybody’s immediate safety. The gun isn’t in an isolated secure place, this is a physician’s office.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          So if you were studying to be a physician and you were given this test question you would refuse to answer it?

            • @[email protected]
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              So then you’re already handling a loaded weapon and your previous statement was in denial. Stay in your lane.