• KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    i have a theory that anarchy always ends in some form of government. I suppose you could have an anarchic government. But i would much rather have a difference government, with the same principles to begin with tbh. Anarchy is more of a driving force to me than anything else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Everything always ends in something else. If it didn’t, it wouldn’t be an ending, or would violate thermodynamics.

      The point is nobody being in charge, in shrinking authority while keeping coordination.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        that’s an interesting place to use a thermodynamics jumpscare, but frankly i think we just need proper isolation from state and federal government, each has their own purpose. They should do specifically what is most productive for themselves and nothing more.

        But that’s just me being fed up with shit being entirely inconsistent from state to state for no fucking reason.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Not a jump scare; conservation. The warm fuzzy part?

          Why do you want people in charge without coordination? That seems remarkably unpleasant.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            it’s not zero coordination, it’s highly coordinated, on account of being incredibly strict by design. The federal government would oversee things that are logical to be controlled by the federal government. The general workings of tax law for example. While state would focus on it’s micro system in comparison to the fed, adjusting federal tax law to be applicable to the state level.

            Etc… repeat ad nauseam, until government no longer shit.