The world has experienced its hottest day on record, according to meteorologists.

The average global temperature reached 17.01C (62.62F) on Monday, according to the US National Centres for Environmental Prediction.

The figure surpasses the previous record of 16.92C (62.46F) - set back in August 2016.

  • @queermunist
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    I disagree.

    People need to be angry. We’re being murdered and we must defend ourselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      So you have all the moral justification of a person fighting for his life here? That’s a pretty significant level of moral authority to wield.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I mean, pretty much anything goes then right? Like, if I crush a puppy’s skull with my foot it’s a horrible thing to do. But if that was the only way I could avoid dying people would understand.

          So basically being in fear of your life means “I get to do anything to anyone and it’s justifiable”

          • @queermunist
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            Well, no, I’m not that greedy for life. After a certain point it’s not worth it and I’ll just make it quick and painless. Life isn’t always preferable to death, I’d need to be able to live with myself afterwards!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Damn I am. I’ll rip the belly out of a live kitten if it’s truly the only way to live. I’ve been afraid for my life before and I never blame anyone for doing what it takes to survive.

              What I take issue with is the level of certainty that such an abstract, complex thing is the same class of threat as someone firing a gun at you or a lion charging you.

              Elevating long chains of logical reasoning, and not applying a mitigating layer of uncertainty to each step to reflect the possibility of mistakes or misinterpretations, so that full-on motivation comes out the other end, strikes me as unwise.

              • @queermunist
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re treating the threat as something abstract, like there aren’t specific people who are to blame for destroying the world. As if it’s no one’s fault, so violence falls on anyone in the name of survival. Even puppies and kittens lol

                I think we have to treat climate change as the same class of threat as someone shooting at us, and that means identifying the shooters and … “disarming” them.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  But is abstracted away. That’s what abstract means. You think some specific person is out there endangering your life. If they are about to murder you, then I’d support you literally killing them. I’m for self defense. I just think it needs to be a clear and present danger to be justified.

                  • @queermunist
                    link
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    There are specific people who are, together, responsible. The oil execs that chose to cover up the truth about global warming, the meat industry execs who did the same, the hucksters that sell the lie of carbon sequestration and ethanol fuel and hydrogen fuel as solutions, the investors that continue to pump money into oil exploration projects, and the politicians that have stopped any meaningful progress from happening. There are, in fact, individual people that we can point to and say “they are the problem” - it’s not abstract.

                    We have enemies and they’re killing us.