YAMAPIKARIYA to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoHoooooooooooooooooootfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageHoooooooooooooooooootfiles.catbox.moeYAMAPIKARIYA to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square123fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•7 months agoNon-tracking solar panels are closer to 12% actual efficiency, 20% would be a theoretical efficiency. I only mention this because you used an actual efficiency estimate for the steam generator but not the solar panel.
minus-squareAggressivelyPassivelinkfedilinkEnglish8•7 months agoThat’s because I’m so smart I completely ignored that the sun moves around during the day.
Non-tracking solar panels are closer to 12% actual efficiency, 20% would be a theoretical efficiency. I only mention this because you used an actual efficiency estimate for the steam generator but not the solar panel.
That’s because I’m so smart I completely ignored that the sun moves around during the day.