• Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
    1282·
    1 year ago

    The absolute beauty of this: readers adding context without denying the actual content of the message. Glorious.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zip
      203·
      1 year ago

      Remember in grammar school when your teacher told you that Wikipedia is not a valid source? I’m sure they’re saying the same thing about AI right now.

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        33·
        1 year ago

        The difference being that on wikipedia you could use the sources on there while AI makes those up as well

        • AA5B
          71·
          1 year ago

          A more important reason is teachers let you use Wikipedia sources, while even valid ai content is “not your work”

        • FeathercrownEnglish
          33·
          1 year ago

          Well, we do have AI that cites sources now, but it’s still not completely accurate.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            16·
            1 year ago

            I remember an AI that wrote a legal motion and justified its arguments by citing cases it made up.

            • FeathercrownEnglish
              43·
              1 year ago

              I mean, of course. For the record, that wasn’t the type that cites its sources intrinsically as part of its response creation process, although it wouldn’t be immune to hallucinations even if it was.

      • pHr34kY
        8·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, and I have to practice mental arithmetic because I won’t always have a calculator in my pocket.

        • 4am@lemm.ee
          11·
          1 year ago

          I mean if all the screenshots people take with their battery in the corner at 1% is any indication, you won’t always have one lol