• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -38 months ago

    Their system (and the Steam client) is proprietary, which means you can’t easily see what the software does or change it. If you can’t control the software then you don’t control the device. People deserve to have the 4 essential freedoms. This is why Windows is bad and it’s the same with SteamOS.

    • @rdri
      link
      118 months ago

      SteamOS is only bad when you expect it to support a variety of hardware. They promised to release it as a standalone and it’s still not there yet, too bad.

      You are correct about Steam client though. Even if they keep the internals closed, the GUI part alone would be worth forking. I wish a chrome-less version would exist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -58 months ago

        Steam Deck is a computer, so its users deserve to have full control over it just like their PC or smartphone.

        You are correct about Steam client though. Even if they keep the internals closed, the GUI part alone would be worth forking. I wish a chrome-less version would exist.

        If people can’t easily modify it, then its developers have power over users. You have to trust that they will not abuse that power, but they already do - with DRM for example.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          58 months ago

          You can install whatever you want on a Steam Deck afaik, so I dont get what you are trying to say here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              Then you can just install something else on it?

              I get that it sucks when a device is locked, because you might need to install a different OS for a multitude of reasons, but as long as you are able to install whatever you want I dont blame the manufacturer.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                08 months ago

                You don’t have to use SteamOS and you don’t have to use Windows, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are unethical operating systems designed to take away user’s freedom. You can’t easily know what it does on your device or change it. It keeps secrets from you. Steam also restricts you with DRM. So unless you are fine with Valve becoming another Microsoft, we need to criticize them for doing this.

                • Communist
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I’m okay with valve replacing microsoft as the go-to proprietary operating system

                  You have to recognize that having an open source almost everything except a single program (steam) is better than what windows is doing by miles, right?

                  You can’t win everything, steam is never going to stop being proprietary, but steam will cause open source to flourish with the caveat that it itself is not open source. The issue is not as black and white as you’re making it seem.

                  Plus if steam wins, getting people to switch to fully open source operating systems will be a lot easier.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Then you don’t care about freedom and having control over your computer. That’s a shame. I think you should.

                    You have to recognize that having an open source almost everything except a single program (steam) is better than what windows is doing by miles, right?

                    But is that actually true? There is no source code for SteamOS 3. How do you know how many packages are proprietary? Even one nonfree package is unethical. People deserve to have control over their computers, I don’t care if it’s currently a little better than Windows.

                    You can’t win everything, steam is never going to stop being proprietary

                    This is irrelevant. We should still try to make the world better and fight the injustice. If gamers realized this 10 years ago, maybe we would have this problem solved by now.

                    The issue is not as black and white as you’re making it seem.

                    You can’t have freedom when someone is actively trying to take it away from you. We have to get rid of proprietary software. If we accept the abuse from those companies, nothing will change. We’ve been fighting this battle for 40 years now. Those companies want to give you an illusion of freedom, so that they can pretend that they are good. They are using the work of Free Software volunteers to build a prison for you.

                    Plus if steam wins, getting people to switch to fully open source operating systems will be a lot easier.

                    No, there is no Free Software alternative to Steam and there is no reason to believe that Valve will release its source code.

                    You are making an assumption that Valve won’t make their system even more proprietary. But why wouldn’t they if their fans are ok with this? They’re already abusing their power with Steam. Giving them more power will only make the abuse worse.

        • @scutiger
          link
          48 months ago

          You have full freedom to install Windows, SteamOS, or even Temple OS on your Steam Deck if you so fancy.

        • @rdri
          link
          08 months ago

          Can you explain what parts of SteamOS are not controllable in a way that makes it more restricted than Arch, which it is based on?

          with DRM for example

          [If the account owns the game - allow user to download and run the game] is a DRM sure… But it’s kind of fair, no?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Can you explain what parts of SteamOS are not controllable in a way that makes it more restricted than Arch, which it is based on?

            Valve won’t release the source code and I don’t use it, so it’s hard for me to tell which packages are proprietary and which are not. Steam client for sure is proprietary and it comes with the OS. Arch by default is Free Software (other than proprietary blobs in the kernel) and you can audit what each program does and modify it. With SteamOS you can’t do that, because Valve keeps secrets from you on your own device.

            [If the account owns the game - allow user to download and run the game] is a DRM sure… But it’s kind of fair, no?

            To play any game you have to install and run the proprietary Steam client and be logged in to an account. Even to play singleplayer games. Even if you bought a physical disc. There are stores that don’t do this: gog.com and itch.io. They provide an optional client for convenience, but you can just download a game’s installer from the website and install it on any PC any time you want. In case of Itch the client is Free Software so anyone can see what it does and modify it.

            • @rdri
              link
              08 months ago

              Valve won’t release the source code

              That doesn’t mean you can’t control how it works. Most people don’t need sources of their Linux distros to use them as they want. It would be cool to have the source, but you wouldn’t expect them to have an official maintained repo since they spend much more resources on actual hardware that needs this distro.

              Steam client for sure is proprietary and it comes with the OS

              Yeah it seems to also be the only thing that is proprietary in SteamOS too.

              To play any game you have to install and run the proprietary Steam client and be logged in to an account.

              Are you clueless or what? There are too many ways to do what you want with SteamOS. You can use offline mode, desktop mode, play pirated games in any mode, install any controller software you like. Finally, install another Linux distro on it, or Windows. But people buy Deck because of SteamOS mostly since it creates the intended (and expected) experience.

              Wanna know why we aren’t seeing many enthusiasts creating more handheld frontends for platforms like Deck? Yeah, not at all because the platform is locked behind DRM or other bs. But because the best experience most people expect is already available and it becomes better with updates.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                18 months ago

                That doesn’t mean you can’t control how it works. Most people don’t need sources of their Linux distros to use them as they want.

                You can’t easily make changes to a program without the source code or even check what it does. Most people are not programmers, so others study the code and make the necessary changes for them.

                It would be cool to have the source, but you wouldn’t expect them to have an official maintained repo since they spend much more resources on actual hardware that needs this distro.

                This is not an excuse. What they are doing is unethical. They put themselves in a position of power over their users. Not much different from Microsoft or Apple.

                Yeah it seems to also be the only thing that is proprietary in SteamOS too.

                I don’t know if that’s true. But the Linux kernel is proprietary as well (just like the one in Arch) - it contains binary blobs without the source code.

                Are you clueless or what? There are too many ways to do what you want with SteamOS. You can use offline mode, desktop mode, play pirated games in any mode, install any controller software you like.

                I was explaining to you how DRM works and why it’s wrong, since apparently you have no idea. I don’t know why you are listing features that any popular desktop operating system has (even Windows). SteamOS is still proprietary, which makes it unethical.

                Finally, install another Linux distro on it, or Windows. But people buy Deck because of SteamOS mostly since it creates the intended (and expected) experience.

                If you buy a Windows laptop, you can install any operating system on it too. That doesn’t make Windows ethical.

                • @rdri
                  link
                  08 months ago

                  You can’t easily make changes to a program

                  99% users won’t ever need that. For cases when they do, they can find guides, modify settings or install software that does what they want.

                  This is not an excuse. What they are doing is unethical.

                  People don’t need an excuse. They play their games and that’s it.

                  it contains binary blobs without the source code

                  Any distro you download can do this exact thing and you wouldn’t know for a long period, unless you spend enough time to compile the whole thing yourself, compare and research.

                  I was explaining to you how DRM works and why it’s wrong

                  I consider myself knowledgeable but you surely chose a wrong example to teach people about DRM. Try some denuvo or eac maybe.

                  If you buy a Windows laptop, you can install any operating system on it too. That doesn’t make Windows ethical.

                  Whatever that means, users don’t care about it. Compared to others, Valve provides a lot more value in most of their solutions. They are hackable just enough to satisfy most enthusiasts.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    18 months ago

                    99% users won’t ever need that. For cases when they do, they can find guides, modify settings or install software that does what they want.

                    You could make the same excuse for Windows.

                    Any distro you download can do this exact thing and you wouldn’t know for a long period, unless you spend enough time to compile the whole thing yourself, compare and research.

                    You don’t have to compile to know this. You can find the list of fully free distros here: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html . Debian removes those blobs too, but it’s not on that list for other reasons.

                    I consider myself knowledgeable but you surely chose a wrong example to teach people about DRM. Try some denuvo or eac maybe.

                    That’s DRM too and there are many more examples. Blu-ray also contains DRM. And so do most PC games thanks to Valve. Console games on the other hand usually don’t have DRM when you buy a physical copy.

                    Whatever that means, users don’t care about it. Compared to others, Valve provides a lot more value in most of their solutions. They are hackable just enough to satisfy most enthusiasts.

                    I know that most people don’t care about their freedom, privacy or security. Most people use Windows. But this doesn’t stop us from trying to build a better world for ourselves and to try to convince others to care.