• themeatbridge
    link
    -77 months ago

    But see that’s where I think the judge erred. By refuting the assertion with evidence of good teaching, the judge creates a test for future rulings. Proving the argument wrong in this case means that the argument would be valid in other cases. So transgender teachers who’s students are below average don’t have the same rights?

    The district has to prove a compelling interest to infringe on the rights of an employee. The burden of proof is on the district, not the teacher, and it should not have been entertained at all.

      • themeatbridge
        link
        -27 months ago

        The reasoning for the denial is caselaw.

        • @Boinkage
          link
          27 months ago

          Caselaw which does not effect stare decisis…

    • z3rOR0ne
      link
      fedilink
      27 months ago

      Agreed. It detracts from the point that misgendering others is a form of hate speech when done intentionally and/or maliciously.

      This is reflected within other minority communities as well, who often have to prove that they are demonstrably “better” at whatever field of expertise or topic they wish to engage in to be considered “worthy” of engaging with those who have historically wielded power and authority over said minorities.

      That said, the US justice system is in a tumultuous turbulent state right now, and I’m happy to take whatever wins we can for my Trans comrades, no matter how small they may be.