@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square215fedilinkarrow-up11.29Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square215fedilink
minus-square@EheranlinkEnglish3•10 months agoGood things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•10 months agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•10 months agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-210 months agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
Good things you stated some? Why not have an actual discussion instead of a pissing contest?
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right