• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -108 months ago

    Linux on phone is great for privacy but can you say that on security ?? It’s open source, not very popular. We’ve seen how it can go wrong recently.

    Id put it in third after grapheneos. But the end result is that it’s not suitable anyway.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          There’s no “us” – just your dumbass.

          It’s open source, not very popular.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -88 months ago

            Your dumbass should check XZ Backdoor.

            It was open source, yet only blind luck led a Microsoft developer to uncover it. It would have gone in most Linux installation otherwise.

            All because of an unpopular package that was maintained by a very few people.

            • Aniki 🌱🌿
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Which was an exception to the rule and found immediately because of open source but go on with your bad self. Hell, they did so much investigative work they figured out it was a Russian hacker masquerading as a Chinese hacker.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                68 months ago

                Wait, they have figured out the source now? Can you give me the link for more reading on how they did it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -28 months ago

                Exception to the rule ?? I’d argue you have no idea how many times it succeeded because that’s the point. We only know what failed, if this worked I have no doubt that companies running Pegasus which have hundreds of millions of dollar of budget every year can success.

                Open source when not maintained properly is fundamentally flawed, there just need one weak element in the chain, one package maintained by a handful of people on their own time.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -3
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    Holy fuck, every time: one line answer, no explanation, just Insults. Find someone to fck instead of crying on the internet.

                • @CrazyLikeGollum
                  link
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  Do you know how many times Microsoft has had a supply chain attack inject a critical vulnerability into Windows? Or how many times a malicious insider at Apple has added a backdoor to iOS?

                  Nope, and you cant possibly know because those systems are closed.

                  With open source software you have the ability to audit the code for vulnerabilities. We have the ability to reasonably state that that incident was an exception to the rule because its so easy to see the available code and major security incidents tend to become major news.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    08 months ago

                    An open not maintained system is worst than a well maintained but closed one. There are billions of $ behind window and macos. Some critical package on Linux are maintained by 2 guys during their spare time…