@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square216fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down160
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square216fedilink
minus-square@Harbinger01173430linkEnglish2•2 months agoBesides, if it fails at art it might even create something we never thought
minus-square@hypnicjerklinkEnglish8•edit-22 months agothis is fundamentally the opposite of what generative AI does. its fail state is basically regurgitating its training data intact.
minus-square@Harbinger01173430linkEnglish0•2 months agoYeah pretty much. I think. I am no art connoisseur though. If I see pretty drawings or images or whatever, I like.
Besides, if it fails at art it might even create something we never thought
this is fundamentally the opposite of what generative AI does. its fail state is basically regurgitating its training data intact.
you kidding? that’s its success state
So… art is essentially failing ahaha.
With style!
Yeah pretty much. I think. I am no art connoisseur though. If I see pretty drawings or images or whatever, I like.