• danielbln
      link
      English
      229 months ago

      You sound like a sour lemon. I’d rather hang out with a hippie that thinks the universe is conscious than someone who slaps a paper tiger license to their low originality threshold posts. Just sayin.

    • @Retrograde
      link
      English
      99 months ago

      I believe you haven’t taken enough shrooms

    • @pufferfisherpowder
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      Are you giving out a license for all your posts? Are you following up on the usage or is it more of a symbolic act?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      But it’s cool.

      Just don’t go thinking it means anything other than nature is awesome.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          I like those better ways too, but I’m me and you’re you. I think the vulgarisation like in the op are good and useful as well. We’re not talking about Deepak Chopra here, just a little mycological poetry.

          I would use the word “special” rather than mystical, but the awesomeness of reality can often feel mystical. I think it’s ok to play with that as long as you aren’t making any serious claims, like we should order our social structure around fungi deity or something

          • cheesymoonshadow
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            I feel exactly the same way as how you described it. I think the quote from OP about the universe experiencing itself actually originated from Carl Sagan, who is as scientific and atheistic as you could ask for. It’s just a play on words.

            And then you have the likes of Deepak Chopra, who is the most disingenuous woowoo-talking charlatan in existence. If he said something like that, he would mean it literally.