U.S. House Vote Narrowly Allows Rampant Abuses of Warrantless Spying Authority to Continue
cdt.org
(WASHINGTON) — Today, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a two-year extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA 702”), a controversial warrantless spying authority, and in an extremely narrow tie vote, rejected critical reforms to stop rampant abuse of the law that has been documented in recent years. FISA 702 warrantless […]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/15271710

Not a good result. The good amendment to add a warrant requirement failed on a tie vote; bad amendments to expand the scope of warrantless wiretapping passed. Next step: a Senate vote.

  • @Ensign_CrabEnglish
    0•9 months ago

    You don’t understand the program

    I understand that whenever a centrist is dead wrong about something, they pull this gaslighting horseshit.

    • @Rapidcreek
      -1•9 months ago

      HILARIOUS

      You centrist! You’re gaslighting me with facts!

      • @Ensign_CrabEnglish
        0•9 months ago

        You pretended that a policy that didn’t exist before 2008 provided the intel Bush ignored before 9/11.

        You don’t understand how linear time works, and have presented no facts.

        • @Rapidcreek
          -2•9 months ago

          You don’t understand how FISA was implemented. You’d rather be consumed by things you don’t know about than become aware of things that are totally out of hand.

          For instance, up the string I said that the courts have ruled that mobile location tracking wasn’t an issue where a warrant was needed. Not only that, but you don’t know mobile location tracking is commercially available. Anyone can buy the data, and that’s wrong. Senator Ron Wydon has been working on this for years. Instead of being worried about all the rights you have that are not being taken away, worry about the those that are.

          • @Ensign_CrabEnglish
            1•9 months ago

            You pretended that section 702 got us the intel Bush ignored prior to 9/11. It couldn’t have, as it was implemented almost a decade later.

            You lied.

            • @Rapidcreek
              -2•9 months ago

              Sigh…if that’s the best you can do, I am now bored.