• @jpreston2005
      link
      010 months ago

      look at you moving goalposts. go back to disappointing your family.

      • @Cryophilia
        link
        010 months ago

        I just misremembered. But my point still stands. You want to ban women over 34 having children?

        • @jpreston2005
          link
          110 months ago

          no, I don’t. you seem pretty intent on trying to make me tho. banning first cousin marriages doesn’t lead to us banning all pregnancies began after the mother is 34. you’re using a logical fallacy of the slippery slope and it doesn’t apply.

          • @Cryophilia
            link
            010 months ago

            It’s not a slippery slope, it’s the exact same thing. The same excuse you use for banning incest equally applies to women over 34 giving birth. Banning that would not be a slippery slope, it would be an equivalence.

            • @jpreston2005
              link
              110 months ago

              no it wouldn’t and that’s your logical fallacy. banning consanguineous marriage does not mean banning all women over the age of 34 from giving birth. You’re wrong.

              • @Cryophilia
                link
                010 months ago

                Why do you want to ban consanguineous marriage?

                • @jpreston2005
                  link
                  110 months ago

                  wanting to ban first cousin marriages does not equate to banning pregnancies from woman aged 34 and older. How many times do you need this repeated to you?