• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    119 months ago

    Obviously not. But switching to something new and worse also clearly isn’t the solution.

    • @danekrae
      link
      English
      -9
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Not something new? That seems a bit odd?

      Try to answer the question people… What is the fucking solution?! You can’t just say “no” to everything, then “I have no suggestions”, but “don’t use new things” and “we shouldn’t use what we do”.

      I’m not advocating for gas, oil or coal. Is the answer nuclear energy, solar, wind? Instead of just downvoting, try to use your words.

      • Amputret
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        Just because something is new doesn’t mean it’s better or should be used. Just look at crypto.

        • @danekrae
          link
          English
          -29 months ago

          So what do we do? Keep killing the planet with what we’ve got, because new is bad?

          • Tar_Alcaran
            link
            fedilink
            English
            79 months ago

            No, bad is bad. There are other solutions, such as electric power, biofuels, etc. everything has downsides, but those are generally less bad with CO2 than the rest.

            • @danekrae
              link
              English
              -19 months ago

              You answered my question now, that I asked a few comments ago, thank you.

              I don’t know if it was you, but why downvote the question? People trying to kill questions to a very important subject seems moronic to me.

              • Tar_Alcaran
                link
                fedilink
                English
                59 months ago

                I’m not down voting you, they’re decent questions to ask. It’s just that the people asking them are usually the “well, you can’t solve 100% of the problem, so I should do whatever I want” crowd.