• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          You need more candidates and a simpler applying process first. 2 tour election won’t help in the current situation

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            58 months ago

            Simply having something sane like score voting would make third party candidates viable and would increase the people attempting to run even with a difficult application process. We can then work on making it easier to apply.

            It’s literally just replace FPTP with score (or even ranked choice) and things would improve from there even without other changes to the election system.

        • @PoliticalAgitator
          link
          28 months ago

          Yes, but there are countries with ranked choice voting that still ultimately come down to “red neoliberals vs blue neoliberals”. They’ve built a machine that is extremely difficult to stop.

      • @Aceticon
        link
        9
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Power Duopoly: not quite as bad as a Power Monopoly - a.k.a. Dictatorship - but not really the same as Democracy.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        In this topic. Can’t extend this vote to cover others.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      70% of Republicans (some small government, eh?) and 40% of Democrats voted yes.

      All my math is wrong. See below for correct numbers.

      • davel [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        8 months ago
        Republican: 126 / (126 + 88 + 0 + 4) = 58%
        Democrat:   147 / (147 + 59 + 0 + 7) = 69%
        
      • @kn33
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        What math are you doing? I got 69% aye from the Democrats and 58% aye from the Republicans.

        Republican: (126 ÷ (126 + 88 + 4)) * 100 = 57.80% Democratic: (147 ÷ (147 + 59 + 7)) * 100 = 69.01%

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          88 is 69.84% of 126… Oh, I see my mistake. Haha. Thanks for the correction. I calculated what percentage of yes the noes are, instead of what percentage of total voters voted yes. I’m hella dumb! In my defense, I was still drinking my morning coffee, and nobody should ever listen to anything I have to say that requires rational thought before I have two cups of coffee.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      And yet people say conservatives won’t vote to stop surveillance. I think we need to stop thinking about political lines. The drama with Trump definitely opened some eyes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        99 months ago

        But they didn’t vote to stop surveillance? It was not stopped. They are the majority and they did not stop it.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          True but its better than the complete bipartisan support it used to have

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            These are like Lauren Bobo, Gaetz, and Green. This is unfortunately not a principled stance but instead because their cult leader told them to “KILL FISA!” IDK if better is the word. It is certainly a broken clock that was correct about that particular time of day.

      • Night Monkey
        link
        fedilink
        -38 months ago

        You aren’t supposed to recognize when some politicians do something right. Just scream about the orange man constantly.