NeuromancerM to [email protected] • 7 months agoSan Francisco bill would let people sue grocery stores for closing too quicklyreason.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down136
arrow-up1-27arrow-down1external-linkSan Francisco bill would let people sue grocery stores for closing too quicklyreason.comNeuromancerM to [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-5•7 months agoIt isn’t their obligation. Maybe the city should do more to reduce the crime.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-5•7 months agoThe homeless are everywhere. Shoplifting is up. Maybe you haven’t noticed but San Francisco has become a shit show. If I was a business. I’d move out as well
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•7 months ago The only reason this law is even necessary is because large corporations like Albertsons have effectively killed their competition in these areas That isn’t the reason at all. It’s because of the crime.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•7 months ago They aren’t even being told to pay for it, just provide 6 months notice before closing! Find another grocery store, created a co-op etc. none of these are their obligations. I suspect this will get thrown out if passed
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-4•edit-27 months agoNo the bill has other restrictions as well. It’s in the article. And who’s enraged? I just think it’s stupid.
It isn’t their obligation. Maybe the city should do more to reduce the crime.
deleted by creator
The homeless are everywhere. Shoplifting is up. Maybe you haven’t noticed but San Francisco has become a shit show. If I was a business. I’d move out as well
deleted by creator
That isn’t the reason at all. It’s because of the crime.
deleted by creator
Find another grocery store, created a co-op etc. none of these are their obligations. I suspect this will get thrown out if passed
deleted by creator
No the bill has other restrictions as well. It’s in the article.
And who’s enraged? I just think it’s stupid.