• @ours
    link
    107 months ago

    Volume doesn’t equates to capability. Can it keep such a crew alive and doing experiments? How long will it last?

    Skylab was pretty much that but terrible to work in and not viable long term.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      27 months ago

      I imagine they could have them docked and every three months send one down and send a new one up. Rotating schedule so there is always at least one in orbit at a time. Less concerns about having a perm structure in space.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        That’s a lot of waste. Keep the heavy structure aloft and move the lighter weight people around.

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          07 months ago

          True but you wouldn’t have to worry about debris in its orbit, or having to run special trips just for supplies and getting rid of garbage, plus you don’t have to worry about maintenance in space. When one is acting up, you undock it and go home.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            27 months ago

            This disallows long term experiments. And it would be way higher of a cost since you have to take everything with you every time. Toilet? Take it with you. Solar panels, them too. All life support needs to be able to work for months, not just a few days. Take all of those supplies with you. Air lock too. And yes, you still have the risks of debris.

            • @afraid_of_zombies
              link
              07 months ago

              I am kinda tempted to see if some of my KSP obsessed friends could try it.

      • @ours
        link
        English
        27 months ago

        Some experiments need to stay longer in space and you need to keep some long-term equipment like larger solar panels.

        • @afraid_of_zombies
          link
          17 months ago

          Could move the experiment from one to the other. Not sure about solar panels.