• @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    27 months ago

    I imagine they could have them docked and every three months send one down and send a new one up. Rotating schedule so there is always at least one in orbit at a time. Less concerns about having a perm structure in space.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      That’s a lot of waste. Keep the heavy structure aloft and move the lighter weight people around.

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        07 months ago

        True but you wouldn’t have to worry about debris in its orbit, or having to run special trips just for supplies and getting rid of garbage, plus you don’t have to worry about maintenance in space. When one is acting up, you undock it and go home.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          This disallows long term experiments. And it would be way higher of a cost since you have to take everything with you every time. Toilet? Take it with you. Solar panels, them too. All life support needs to be able to work for months, not just a few days. Take all of those supplies with you. Air lock too. And yes, you still have the risks of debris.

          • @afraid_of_zombies
            link
            07 months ago

            I am kinda tempted to see if some of my KSP obsessed friends could try it.

    • @ours
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      Some experiments need to stay longer in space and you need to keep some long-term equipment like larger solar panels.

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        17 months ago

        Could move the experiment from one to the other. Not sure about solar panels.