• @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    The time machine would use gravity so it can arrive at the same relative position in a different time. But that only gets you on the planet, not the same position on the planet.

    How would rotational movement be accounted for in a generic way?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17 months ago

      How would rotational movement be accounted for in a generic way?

      I don’t know how it would be accounted for in your imagine time-machine. Because they don’t exist.

      What I do know. Is that you don’t need gravity to “detect” earths rotational speed. Because we already know what it is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          And is there a reason you couldn’t program that data into the machine?

          Doesn’t that sound like something you’d need? Along with a mathematical model of how earth orbits the sun?

          • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
            link
            English
            17 months ago

            If the machine has the ability to jump in time and space (needed to land in the same spot) then it would be a real waste to use it only on earth.

            So we would need a mathematical model of the entire universe that is accurate to the metre over all time. This N body is much harder than the 3 body problem.

            Or we use gravity and other methods to track relative stationary position.

            So, what other methods can be used to determine rotation?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Jesus fucking Christ. We can still calculate the rotation of a body like we normally do.

              You observe it. Wait 1 seconds. Observe it again. And the delta in position is your rotational speed per second.

              That is the method. The only one

              • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                link
                English
                17 months ago

                So all travels to new planets require 2 jumps. One to get near and measure the rotation, and one to actually land. I’d prefer something more efficient.

                Also there is the assumption that the surface rotational velocity is constant over time. This is only true for solid planets without gas or liquid centers. Insides can spin at different speeds than the surface.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  I don’t even know what this conversation is about anymore. You wanna go inside a gas giant now?

                  How about this. When you develop timetravel through space in all dimensions to “jump” anywhere at any time. Let us know.

                  • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
                    link
                    English
                    27 months ago

                    I don’t even know what this conversation is about anymore.

                    It’s about how a theoretical time/space machine would navigate obeying current physics knowledge.

                    You wanna go inside a gas giant now?

                    I’d like the option. I’d certainly like to land on planets with liquid cores.

                    How about this. When you develop timetravel through space in all dimensions to “jump” anywhere at any time. Let us know.

                    Nah. Let’s design the solution now so it’s ready to be used when needed.