• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    357 months ago

    It really should have to pass some form of nonpartisan review before being able to be introduced. I hate that as a private citizen, I have to track possible legislation and make time during the day to tell them that it’s clearly unconstitutional, have them pass it anyways, and then wait between 2-10 years for the courts to tell them (maybe).

    • @gdog05
      link
      167 months ago

      Informally, I believe this has been resolved by having the state attorney general sign off on most legislation as to its constitutionality. In my state, the attorney general is a shitheel. But, he has called out anti-gay legislation as blatantly unconstitutional and a waste of time and money. The lawmakers want headlines and ALEC money. They don’t give two shits about it being lawful or costly or harmful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        67 months ago

        I’m not aware of any states where the attorney general can block introduction of legislation.

        • @gdog05
          link
          137 months ago

          If I insinuated they could block it, that wasn’t my intention. It is basically a check without teeth. They can make a stink about it and a recommendation to the governor before signing but they have no legislative power.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      27 months ago

      some form of nonpartisan review

      Putting the legislation in front of my nonpartisan review board of Federalist Society Judges, Corporate Board Members, and Silicon Valley AI machines.