Found here: https://twitter.com/CarsRuinedCity/status/1677005785862406144?t=Xolo43mUk4GnegFQE19q3g&s=19

Caption: Photo collage of a beach in Alexandria, Egypt, showing a progression in 3 images:

  1. Alexandria “Problem” - empty beach + walking street + 6 lane road with medium traffic + dense mid-rise buildings (likely housing)
  2. Alexandria “Solution” - empty beach (doesn’t seem to matter) + narrower walkway or sidewalk + 10 lane brand new and empty road + tiny sidewalk + the same buildings
  3. Alexandria “Results” - crowded beach + crowded beach walkway + traffic jam on the 10 lane road
  • BrooklynManEnglish
    2•1 year ago

    all you’ve illustrated is that the only place my statement doesn’t apply is in a theoretical (and impossible) fantasy, but you do then go on to explain the means by which what I said is true.

    so… thanks?

    • @[email protected]English
      -1•1 year ago

      It’s a conversation bro. We agree about some parts and have other thoughts about other parts.

      It’s not the width of the highway that CAUSES the traffic alone, it’s the bottlenecks and access. It’s not the induced demand alone that causes the issue, it’s the offramps and local streets that ruin the new highway.

      • BrooklynManEnglish
        1•1 year ago

        It’s not the width of the highway that CAUSES the traffic alone, it’s the bottlenecks and access. It’s not the induced demand alone that causes the issue, it’s the offramps and local streets that ruin the new highway.

        I’m pretty sure I thanked you explaining how my initial statement was correct.

        It’s a conversation bro. We agree about some parts and have other thoughts about other parts.

        and I’m enjoying the conversation, bro. your “other” thoughts seem to be an explanation of how my statement is correct and why.