• TheChurn
    link
    fedilink
    07 months ago

    One thing that the article didn’t touch on, since it was focused on input costs, is the extra pollution from using EVs.

    EVs are substantially heavier than ICEs of the same class, due to the battery. This leads to extra wear on the tires, break pads, and road surface -> even more micro plastics and particulate air pollution.

    We need to reduce our ecological footprint, not merely change it from oil to reactive metals.

    • @Oddbin
      link
      47 months ago

      I never changed my pads in 65k miles so that’s not true sorry.

      They are on average slightly heavier but we’re talking 100-200kg. That’s nothing, 10-15%, definitely not “substantially”. Less if you add fuel to the ICE.

      There’s not any extra pollution. There’s an investment cost and then tyre wear. Which you get from an ICE. Along with, you know, all the pollution from the combustion engine. Which is at most 24% efficient (more likely middle teens) and only continues to pollute rather than electric vehicles which don’t.

      Electric cars may not be the ultimate solution but they’re a damn sight better than the status quo so let’s stop this kind on hysterical posting eh?