XD. Sure, you never explicitly stated that you can prove me wrong, I just assumed, like any reasonable person would that a purpose of bringing up an argument in a debate is to prove ones point. You can go ahead and answer now.
Your argument for me being wrong was that you can prove me wrong with a real world example, and you have no evidence to support the real world example that you provided.
The part about you having no evidence is true, because you have no evidence.
The part about it being your argument for me being wrong is an assumption on my part and depends on why you brought up the “real world example”, so if your reason for bringing it up was anything else than to try to prove me wrong, you can clarify why you brought it up and then we will know if I lied or not.
So I never said anything about proof. As your quotes show. You lied.
Why did you bring up the “real world example” if not to prove me wrong?
Maybe I’ll answer that when you admit that’s not what I said and that you lied.
XD. Sure, you never explicitly stated that you can prove me wrong, I just assumed, like any reasonable person would that a purpose of bringing up an argument in a debate is to prove ones point. You can go ahead and answer now.
This is what you said:
Do you admit it was a lie?
The part about you having no evidence is true, because you have no evidence.
The part about it being your argument for me being wrong is an assumption on my part and depends on why you brought up the “real world example”, so if your reason for bringing it up was anything else than to try to prove me wrong, you can clarify why you brought it up and then we will know if I lied or not.
I guess you don’t want me to answer your question. Oh well.
My answare is dependent on your answare. I don’t know if my assumption is incorrect because I don’t know why you brought it up.
I asked you first. Not my problem if you can’t admit that you lied.