• @sazey
    link
    English
    -112 months ago

    Like most published research isn’t unreproducible horseshit mostly there because of name dropping or dollars.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      Fwiw the reproducibility crisis isn’t because of “horseshit” science. There are a few examples of that for sure. But the vast majority of it is just good science that happens to be wrong. The scientific method doesn’t mean the wrong conclusion can be drawn, especially when for budgetary reasons sample sizes are relatively limited, or when the effect size being studied is small, or there are too many confounding variables.

      That’s not a mark against the studies though. It’s just a mark in favour of attempting to reproduce studies and giving good funding to attempts to do so. And perhaps a mark against using one-off studies with small effect sizes to shape public policy or health advice.

      • @sazey
        link
        English
        -52 months ago

        My critique was not aimed at the scientific method itself nor at constraints faced by researchers. I was aiming more towards the sneering attitude that published research is the only valid method of drawing a conclusion, especially at the person level.

        • @Aux
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          One published paper is not a valid method of drawing a conclusion. Studying references, citations and related papers is.

    • @troglodytis
      link
      English
      102 months ago

      Correct, most published research is not unreproducible horseshit.

      • @sazey
        link
        English
        -52 months ago

        So it is reproducible horseshit, got it.