• @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
    link
    English
    49
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I don’t really use TikTok but I really hope this gets tossed by the courts. I don’t care if ByteDance is owned by cthulus and draculas, it’s a terrible precedent to have the government ban a media company. If we don’t like China having access to data, ban apps from collecting it in the first place. Require algorithm audits. There are so many better ways to handle this than singling out TikTok.

    • @danc4498
      link
      English
      251 month ago

      Everybody talks about Facebook like they’re owned by the American government. They’re not. I’m sure the US government gets massive amounts of data from them, but they can’t control Facebook in the way China can control Tik Tok. And much of their surveillance is public with warrants whereas China does not need to follow any of that.

        • @danc4498
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          I get it. But it’s night and day different than the actual government owning the company.

        • @jumjummy
          link
          English
          91 month ago

          If you think the Chinese government doesn’t have its hand directly up in Tik Tok, you’re absolutely fooling yourself. China has much more direct control over companies, well beyond what the US government has.

        • @danc4498
          link
          English
          -31 month ago

          So this bill is not going to do anything but require ByteDance to sell the tiny small insignificant minuscule 1% that the Chinese government owns and in no way uses to influence how the company is run.

          Sounds like it’s no big deal!

    • HidingCat
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Don’t forget, control the sale of data too. Audits etc to make sure they comply with privacy safeguards, and so on.

      This is just pandering as well as, I suspect, to give a corporate donor a profit-making business.

    • @Meron35
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      The precedent was already set back in 2020 when the US government forced Kunlun to sell Grindr

    • @Passerby6497
      link
      English
      -31 month ago

      it’s a terrible precedent to have the government ban a media company

      Good thing TikTok’s not actually being banned then isn’t it? It’s just being forcibly sold, which is quite different.