It started with notebooks, but that wasn’t the master plan.

  • @micka190
    link
    English
    38 months ago

    Nothing, but it’d still be a win for the consumer because then we’d have repairable/customizable laptops across the board?

    We’ve also seen other brands aren’t interested in it because it’s harder to make smaller/thinner laptops when they need to be customizable. Also they make more money from having people throw out their old laptops and buying a new one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      88 months ago

      More likely not.

      Microsoft is well known for buying software companies to shut them down.

      Foldershare was a product in 2005 that enabled you to share windows folders across the internet just like sharing across a LAN. MS bought them.

      Same with Ubiboot - it enabled you to move a windows install from one machine to any other hardware - on boot it would reconfigure the drivers. Worked brilliantly.

      I’ve used countless products over the years which no longer exist after they were acquired by MS. Things which don’t even exist within MS offerings. Clearly bought to be shut down.

      • chingadera
        link
        English
        78 months ago

        This can’t be right because capitalism breeds innovation like they said! Right? …Right??

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          It does. Those were both innovative products.

          Not sure why you feel the need to derail the conversation with your ideology.

          • chingadera
            link
            English
            18 months ago

            Your conversation is about shelving products so other companies cannot compete.