• @dogslayeggs
    link
    English
    17 months ago

    Yes, but you prefaced that with a long story about why there were so many gay men as priests. If it had nothing to do with gay men, just people in general, why did you think it was relevant to say there were a ton of gay priests?

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      English
      27 months ago

      Because the gay men were part of the church specifically because they were gay, and were sexually repressed by the very same institution.

      • @dogslayeggs
        link
        English
        17 months ago

        The point is that it doesn’t matter if they were gay. Straight priests were also sexually repressed by the church. It’s the sexual repression that matters, not the sexual identity of the person. But you led up to your conclusion with a big story about gay people, which implies that gay people were somehow more inclined to acting out on repression than straight people.