• @PopOfAfrica
      link
      117 months ago

      Im a massive proponent of FOSS, But I have not heard a single sustainable FOSS model for maintaining free search engines. It just takes so much capital to operate.

      I think a paid model is much better than a privacy disrespecting / ad driven one.

        • @PopOfAfrica
          link
          37 months ago

          It is if they dont store search queries, which they claim they dont. I have no reason to distrust them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Dude. There are like twenty ways around that without outright lying. Also they could outright lie.

            • @PopOfAfrica
              link
              27 months ago

              By that logic, brave, duck duck go, start page, qwant, and mojeek could also just be lying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        07 months ago

        FOSS and paid are not mutually exclusive, but Kagi is not FOSS and of dubious transparency/trustworthiness.

        Also Kagi is not operating a search engine, but a search aggregator mostly dependent on Google. They don’t need much upfront capital to operate.

        An actual search indexer competitive with Google is too expensive to be profitable without (tens of) millions of paid users or hundreds of millions of free ones (i.e. bing and maaaaybe yandex?).

        True google alternatives are therefore only going to come out of big capital (MSFT), or less likely a government (EU?) funded company. There might be an argument to be made for decentralized search as well, but the only actual contender in that field right now is a crypto thing that probably relies mostly on bing/google. Still, a decentralized open indexer may actually make some sense in theory.

        • @PopOfAfrica
          link
          17 months ago

          Right, but nobody hates google because ofits results. They hate that its privacy invasive.